Wherein I join Mr. Beller's Neighborhood

Wat Bronx (my photo)

At the northern tip of Mr. Beller's Neighborhood is what passes for New York's Little Cambodia.

Find out Wat is the Wat.

The looming wordearth is about to fall on your head

It must be spring: the writers are aswarm.

The PEN World Voices festival runs April 24-29, with topics close to OPP's heart. Wednesday's program:

Writers explore what binds us to home and what holds us apart from it, and why home, or the idea of it, is or isn’t worth dying and killing for. How do we find home, and, when we lose it, how do we make a new one? Why do we leave home and why do we long to return? We’ll visit the domestic, the exiled, the global, and the imagined in search of a place we can call our own.

Which is what OPP has been trying to explore himself, see.

Not to be outdone by the non-print set, PEN (last bastion of that thing called book) has gone interactive this year:
-- In Home & Away, laypeople like you and me can give our 2 cents on the topic.
-- In the postcard series, you can, well, send a postcard.

Note that of the 166 participant writers listed in "World Voices," only 9 hail from South America, with half of these currently living in the US (*) :

Daniel Alarcon* (Peru)
Mariela Dreyfus* (Peru)
Guillermo Arriaga (Mexico)
Carlos Maria Dominguez (Argentina/Uruguay)
Jorge Franco (Colombia)
Laura Restrepo (Colombia)
Jaime Manrique* (Colombia)
Cecilia Vicuna* (Chile)
Patricia Melo (Brazil)

Same strange idea of "world" (as in baseball's "world" series) when it comes to Asia: sole non-Chinese, non-Indian Asian Tinling Choon of Malaysia, currently at Yale, must stand in for the rest.

There might be something to be learned from former imperial power U.K., which lists only one bona fide 100% U.K. participant, Jo Tatchell, who... oops! ... writes on Middle Eastern culture. The other 9 U.K. participants are slash-U.K. participants, as in "Zanzibar/U.K.", "China/U.K." and even "U.S./U.K.", in that order. Well, what's home, but a place we can call our own, eh?

Wherein the Twin Towers appear on a graph of aid to Latin America

Ever wonder where the focus is for US foreign policy in Latin America? The CIP has compiled some truly eloquent graphs.

For a clearer view, the original post from Adam Isacson, here. Note that the scales are the same for each pair of charts, in case you thought there was distortion.

Military and Police Aid to Latin America, by Program, 1997-2006:


Military and Police Aid to Latin America by Program, Minus Colombia, 1997- 2008:


--------------------------------------------------

Aid to Latin America, 1997-2006:


Aid to Latin America, Minus Colombia,1997-2006:

"Non-traditional" -- is that like innovative?

(photo: USSOUTHCOM)

The Center for International Policy's Adam Isacson, back from a two-day conference at Southern Command, describes in today's Plan Colombia and Beyond post bravely standing before a room full of Latin American military brass, and telling them that Costa Rica, which renounced its standing army in 1948, has got it right.

He deserves some kind of NGO Purple Heart -- the Purple Barbed-wire-wrapped Candle?

As usual, a thoughtful presentation of a serious, and overlooked, problem in South America: cash-strapped governments sending their militaries out to do traditionally civilian duties, anything from heavy-gunned police and anti-narcotics work to environmental protection in understaffed parks to Chavez's outright use of military for "teaching in schools, building housing, and running neighborhood food kitchens ."

The lines too easily blur, Isacson says, when the military, whose exceptional and definitive task is the obliteration of an enemy, takes over the role of civilian police.

A number of realities are at play:

-- the threat of foreign aggression has all but disappeared, making armies irrelevant, as Costa Rica eloquently demonstrates,
-- internal insecurity and civil disorder make police, on the other hand, supremely relevant,
-- the civil societies in question (for a variety of reasons) are not meeting other civil needs (besides security) through civil government,
-- the easy and short-sighted solution is to fuse all of these, dumping civil jobs on a military that can't say no, and police jobs on a military that doesn't have to answer to civil judges.

Sound like a familiar Latin American two-step toward military rule? Isacson concludes:

The Costa Rican delegation to the conference was clearly proud of, and satisfied with, the choice their country had made back in 1948. As governments throughout the region become ever more worried about internal crime, and defense from foreign aggression becomes ever less a compelling mission, the Costa Rican model seems to make more and more sense. Why not focus all security resources on improving the police - the institution designed to deal with the crime threat that worries citizens the most?

Needless to say, none of the other militaries present, much less Southern Command, voiced enthusiasm for the Costa Rican model. As far as possible alternatives go, it's still a bit too “non-traditional.”

Making it clear to the world the kind of people you are

The caption from iJET's website: "iJET's Intelligence Operations and Response Center provides clients with 24x7 threat assessments and intelligence for more than 180 countries and 280 cities worldwide."


Most people don't know that three Americans have been held hostage in Colombia for over four years. Here's how the AP reminded us of the contract workers' existence prior to Bush's trip south. The article quotes Bush:

"I'm deeply concerned about their fate," President Bush said in an interview with RCN TV of Colombia on Wednesday, before leaving on a five-nation trip to Latin America.

Addressing FARC, Bush said: "Give up these hostages. You're making it clear to the world the kind of people you are when you take innocent life and hold them hostage. And it's very sad for the families here in America."

You may understand then, perhaps, the existence of such firms as iJET: Intelligent Risk Systems.

iJET is the intelligence wing of the modern mercenary industry. Got big-wigs (or even just "assets" like employees) to send overseas to places like Colombia? iJET will help you keep track of them, warn them about when and where to go, tell them what to do when they get stuck. iJET markets this as MONITOR, PROTECT and RESPOND. (Another "security firm," Osen-Hunter, prefers ACCOUNTABILITY, INTEGRITY, DISCRETION.)

We are truly a commercial intelligence agency supporting you and your employees – "Watching the World, Anticipating the Future".

Sign up for the WPM (right), a Daily Intelligence Briefing, and a Monthly Intelligence Forecast. Save money by consolidating your security. As the website puts it:

The escalation of terrorism, infectious diseases, and unforeseen natural disasters has forced multinational organizations and their employees to re-evaluate their perception of risk.

Want to work for them? Some "Desired Attributes:"

• International travel and expatriate living experience with an understanding of how world events affect international organizations and businesses
• Knowledge of business continuity, emergency management, incident support or corporate security programs
• Familiarity with transportation systems

It's hardly a new idea. One of my favorite used-book finds in Colombia was a little white handbook, one of several in a series called "Executive Crisis Management," written by former British Police from Northern Ireland. This one was called, "Kidnap!" and it had several no-nonsense bullet point lists of things to do and not to do when, as the executive that you are, you are being taken hostage. Suggestion: keep track of your time by making marks on anything you have handy, but not on the wall -- you might be moved at any time.

Together with Osen-Hunter, iJET runs something they call the Alert Traveler Program:

The Alert Traveler Program (ATP) educates individuals through comprehensive and experiential exercises regarding the risks associated with foreign and domestic travel, and provide the knowledge, skills and abilities to reduce these risks.

One of their suggested targets is "Individuals traveling on vacation that seek to increase their travel confidence" -- and I truly wonder: What does the world look like to a person like that?

Bush in Bogota III

So, how did the visit go?


Photo: Héctor Fabio Zamora, El Tiempo

And another summing up, from the voice of the president himself.

See that sharp drop?

click to enlarge

Adam Isacson, of the Center for International Policy, reminds us today in his truly wonderful Plan Colombia and Beyond blog, not to believe reports that US aid to Latin America has doubled under Dubya.

Bush in Bogota II

click on the image while you still can.

Meanwhile, the Colombian foreign office has its knickers all in a twist about a caricature Amnesty International put out just ahead of Bush's visit.

Watch it, and see for yourself if it warrants this response from Minister of Foreign Relations, Fernando Araujo Perdomo:

Deseo expresar mi más profundo rechazo y enérgica protesta por el contenido y publicación de ese video clip, toda vez que constituye un irrespeto a los esfuerzos, sufrimiento y lucha del Gobierno y del pueblo colombianos en su aspiración legítima de alcanzar la paz.

I wish to express my deepest rejection and most energetic protest for the contents and publication of this video clip, which is disrespectful of the efforts, suffering and struggle of our Government and the Colombian people in their legitimate desire for peace.

Amnesty's response a day later.